FIRST EIGHT COMPLAINTS AGAINST MLAMBO JP

August 2024

1. Brink's first eight complaints against Mlambo JP delivered in mid-2017.For clearest resolution and easiest reading, the eight complaints before signature, bundled, indexed and paginated.

2. Mlambo JP's response on 7 June 2018.

3. Brink's invited comments on the response on 28 June 2018.

4. Mlambo JP's further response to the first complaint, now on oath, confirmed by his former secretary, also on oath -- 4 November 2020, delivered to Brink on 22 February 2021.

5. Brink's invited comments on the second response (webpage version) on 24 March 2021.

6. Judicial Conduct Committee ('JCC') member Zondi JA's decision on 8 July 2021.

7. Brink's appeal on 10 August 2021, delivered and acknowledged.

8. Brink's invited submissions concerning his appeal, for consideration at ithe JCC appeal committee meeting at the Constitutional Court on 10 December 2021; acknowledged.

9. On 19 February 2024, the JCC Appeal Committee upholds Brink's appeal against Zondi JA's dismissal of his criminal and other capital charges against Mlambo JP, and recommends he answer Brink's most serious criminal and other capital charges before a Judicial Conduct Tribunal. Here's the decision and its covering letter. Material excerpts handily marked up.

10. The JSC rejected the JCC appeal committee's recommendation on 6 May 2024.

11. Brink tested the legality of this decision with a searching PAIA request on 1 July 2024.

12. The JSC's response on 30 August 2024 revealed grotesque irregularities in the JSC's handling of the case. To quote from the corrupt-judges.co.za homepage:

To his credit, the transcript shows that (a) Raymond Zondo CJ very properly urged and later voted, along with two other unidentified commissioners, for the adjournment of the matter to afford Brink an opportunity to address the masses of new evidence, including many documents, that Mlambo JP grossly irregularly and very prejudicially wove, unsworn, into his fantastically dishonest 223-page submissions; but (b) Zondo CJ and those two other commissioners were outvoted nine to three, despite his explicit warning to his fellow commisioners that in such an event Brink would surely take the the whole unlawful shambles on judicial review and that the JSC's decision would be overturned, like so many others in the past.

***